Originality

[lpgservers]

OK, obviously this isn't going anywhere. I'll leave that subject die since it's apparent you don't understand that displaying/stating something without a notation of a disclaimer is dishonest when there is in fact a disclaimer and that you don't/can't provide what it is your advertising.

 

This has so twisted away from the only simple reason I posted it. That was to simply state that your advertising in your signature is dishonest/incorrect and for you to chastise someone about something you think is morally/ethically lacking while your doing something that can be construed as the same is what is known as an oxymoron.

[SickPuppy]

OK, obviously this isn't going anywhere. I'll leave that subject die since it's apparent you don't understand that displaying/stating something without a notation of a disclaimer is dishonest when there is in fact a disclaimer and that you don't/can't provide what it is your advertising.

 

This has so twisted away from the only simple reason I posted it. That was to simply state that your advertising in your signature is dishonest/incorrect and for you to chastise someone about something you think is morally/ethically lacking while your doing something that can be construed as the same is what is known as an oxymoron.

 

Still a dolt I see

[adeol]

I can see both sides of the argument. Puppy seems to be overly upset. Either way, both of you should drop it and move on. We all understand your position on this particular subject.

[lpgservers]

It's been dead for 3 days, congrats on bumping it.