dantheman420 Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 Hey guys i dont know if you have seen this article or not but check it out and read the whole thing and tell me what you think: http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=620329 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steven Crothers Posted March 28, 2009 Share Posted March 28, 2009 VALVe confirmed that it makes no difference. You just need to have a minimum of 100 fps on the server, that's all. Yea its obviously a joke, ask any player who knows the difference and he'll explain it. GSP don't have to defend themselves. Its not a marketing ploy, its tossing more CPU horsepower at a server to make it run better in the simplest sense. I have an argument to the opposite, if your on a shitty server, can you tell? If there is such thing as shitty, why isn't there such a thing as good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dantheman420 Posted March 29, 2009 Author Share Posted March 29, 2009 yea i agree Steven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptadmin Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 I believe the guy is correct always have felt its just false hope. We only offer the 500 FPS only because everyone asks for it. I feel tick rate compares to some providers using the CPU Priority which in my opinion is just a misleading business practice to claim CPU priority when the provider knows CPU priority is not something that works for any company financially. Thats my opinion. So I partially agree with the guy that made this post on steam. I may be wrong but I just think its something that makes a customer warm and fuzzy even though the change of tick rate doesnt make much difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.